at the edge

Here's the latest version of the piece of paper which people says would facilitate my escape from this mental institution I'm currently living in.

tka v0.4 wracked.doc

Its still far from being 'layak sidang' (admissable for academic defense), but its closer then I've ever been. Let's see wether I live or not...

Oh and on other news, the gigantic two-page New York Times advertisement is up. Here's the official press release from the Mozilla Foundation. I personally like the design very much....

Firefox 1.0 NYT Ad

Posted at 10:19:50 am by ferdikom98
Comments (%d)  

the death cry of an almost dropout, part II

What is the Gift of Writing? Why would someone be expected to be able to form concepts into clear written language? What is this segregation imposed upon those that cannot form words consistent with a structured norm?

What are words?

What is a paper?

Why can't I write one?

It is silly for me to be able to bore my friends to death speaking about Free Software and then go on to say that I cannot write a paper outlining a plan to promote Free Software. I totally agree. Why am I silly?


Posted at 5:29:12 pm by ferdikom98
Comments (%d)  

the death cry of an almost dropout


This is only chapter 1. Half of it, that is. There's no IMC plan to speak of. (Yet). The completed plan, as my graduation paper must be done on the 15th.

I have serious doubts about my skill as a marketer


Posted at 12:53:37 pm by ferdikom98
Comments (%d)  

meditative lyrics

hmm-mm-mm... hmm-mm-mm...
hmm-mm-mm... hmm-mm-mm...

And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply.
And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply.
And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply.
And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply.

And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply.
And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply.
And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply.
And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply.

mmm dap-pap... mmm dap-pap-pa-n-dum-n-dum-n.
mmm dap-pap... mmm dap-pap-pa-n-dum-n-dum-n.
mmm dap-pap... mmm dap-pap-pa-n-dum-n-dum-n.
mmm dap-pap... mmm dap-pap-pa-n-dum-n-dum-n.

And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply.
And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply-y-y-y-y.
And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply.
And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply.

mmm dap-pap... mmm dap-pap-pa-n-dum-n-dum-n.
mmm dap-pap... mmm dap-pap-pa-n-dum-n-dum-n.
mmm dap-pap... mmm dap-pap-pa-n-dum-n-dum-n.
mmm dap-pap... mmm dap-pap-pa-n-dum-n-dum-n.

And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply.
And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply.
And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply.
And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply-y-y-y-y-y

And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply.
And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply.
And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply.
And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply.

hmm-mm-mm... hmm-mm-mm...

Don't Let The Man.
Fatboy Slim
from the Album 'Palookaville'

I'm gonna cut my hair. Not!
BTW get the album if you want, its nice enough:)

Posted at 7:40:28 pm by ferdikom98
Comments (%d)  


Your purpose is to the embetterment of man. The embertterment of man is about action. Your action must bring goodness to the world. Work is hard, even torcherous. But you must bring the embetterment of man.

But my Lord, is the embetterment of man always in line with Your purpose? What is the ultimate embetterment of Man? How is it that Man can become Divine? Is divinity the ultimate embetterment of Man?

So many questions. You have begun your journey into your seeking for me. You have travelled, but no more than to take the first few steps of a quintizillion. Infinity is my distance, but you are making progress. Questions cannot be answered by your seeking rest, for your journey is forever long.

But that cannot be, Lord. I only live but for a lifetime. Surely my lifetime is not an infinite number of years? How will I answer the Question before I reach my Zenith?


You seek the answer to your Question. Your answer lies ahead. Live. Persevere.

(Do less and I will personally Smite you.)

Posted at 9:26:08 pm by ferdikom98
Comments (%d)  

power compression

I would like to take this opportunity to promote Power Archiver 9.0.

It may seem strange that I am promoting a proprietary software (albeit shareware), but I just have to because it truly does match and even beats WinZip. Its not that I hate WinZip or anything, I mean I've been using it ever since I switched to Windows 3.1 way back when I was still in junior high. WinZip has served its purpose admirably, albeit at the cost of PkZip's (at the time) main source of income.

And that was how WinZip got its life. Anybody who's been using computers long enough would remember that WinZip was just a graphical frontend for PKWare's PKZip and PKUnZip when it was first released. And then few versions later it built its own internal full-fledged compression engine thus making PKWare's executable unnecesary in Windows. The funny thing is PKWare itself began life by allegedly hijacking a compression algoritm that was generally presumed to be free knowledge in the public domain.

Few outside of the enthusiast PC-user community would remember, but there was a bit of an uproar in the software industry during the early eighties when a company named Unisys patented the LZW compression algorithm (more about compression patents from faqs.org). Back before Unisys patented the algorithm it was generally thought by the general programming community that LZW cannot be patented since the authors disclosed all the technical details of the algorithm to the general public at 1977. But the patent application was granted, and Unisys licensed it to Compuserve for the creation of the GIF format, and then to PKWare to create the ZIP format.

Fortunately the LZW was only a variation of an algorithm. Abraham Lempel and Jacob Ziv disclosed the LZ77 algorithm to the world in 1977. Variations of that algorithm can be found easily by googling LZW or LZ77. Anyway as history goes there was a backlash from the Free Software community to the patent. InfoZip was created, and also GnuZip (its extension is .gz). Other mathematicians tried improving the old algorithm. A result that was popular among the open source community was the BZip2 algorithm (with the extension .bz2).

I had discovered BZip2 while examining my Fedora 2 installation and noticed that for documentation that was both packaged in .zip, .gzip, and .bz2, the .bz2 archive was noticeably smaller while the .zip was significantly bigger. I searched for a utility to create and open bz2 archives, and what I discovered was the already mentioned InfoZip, the LZW patent, its connection to the various Bzip2 sites, various nitpicks, and finally the fact that Power Archiver 9.0 can do compression and decompression of .bz2 files.

Not only Bzip2, Power Archiver also natively handles GZip, traditional Zip, both WinZip's and PKZip's proprietary Zip extensions, .tgz (GZipped Tarballs), tbz2 (BZipped Tarballs), even RARs. But the coup-de-gracé, if one would say is its default compression format, which compresses even better than BZip2, called 7z. Now 7Zip is an open source compression format developed by Igor Pavlov for his 7Zip compression utility. Apparently he made an even more optimized version of the LZ77 algorithm for use in his 7Zip program. There are efforts at transferring the algorithm to the Free/Open Source Software world, but it was somewhat hindered because of Pavlov's uses of some proprietary Windows C++ hooks in his source code. But there is some progress being made; they're not quite done yet but its getting very close.

So right now the best widely available compression utility with the best compression ratio is fully available in Windows, but it doesn't make market penetration because of WinZip's very big brand identity. And of course, as usual, constructive laziness;)

Posted at 1:01:40 pm by ferdikom98
Comments (%d)  

denial pt.2

This is life, there's always pressure.
If you're not feeling pressure then you're not alive.

It is wrong to give up before you fight.
You give up before you fight and you might as well die.

note: I discovered just now that I had hit 'Save Draft' instead o Publish; sorry to appear to fool anyone but I did actually write this at the time indicated...

Posted at 9:26:55 pm by ferdikom98
Comments (%d)  


How do I tell the world that I don't want to graduate? I mean, how can I possibly afford not to graduate? Everything, every possible path involved in my living the rest of my life in relative comfort revolves around the concept of my having an undergraduate degree. I can't work without an undergraduate degree. I do not have any skill, no matter how I think to the contrary, if I do not have an undergraduate degree.

How do I know that I don't want to graduate? Is it just plain denial now that it is so obvious that I CANNOT FINNISH MY graduation &paper by the 15 thus I cannot possibly graduate? What right do I have to go against the wishes of the world and selfishly declare that I will not pass through this mandated initiation right into the modern 21st century Indonesian workforce that all middle class citizens must pass through lest the person be considered a vagrant beligerent non-person with nothing but uncouth thoughts coursing through the person's mind?


Posted at 8:08:01 pm by ferdikom98
Comments (%d)  

personal full disclaimer


first, a short thesis on the creative commons. If you're not interested in reading another one of my rants, then you may want to go directly to my disclaimer text. If not, then well...

So why did I license the contents of my blog to the creative commons license? Well, basically its because I believe that copyright today as a legal concept has been perverted too far away from its original purpose, and that those perversion causes undesirable effects upon culture and society.

If you would try to explore discussions on copyright available in legal texts, online texts, history books and other sources all available freely, you would discover that the original purpose of copyright law was to stimulate innovation in the arts and sciences by granting a limited monopoly to the authors of such innovations on the distribution of such innovations. The Statute of Anne originally made in the 16th century was formed on this basis. The US Constitution confirms this for US citizens, basing its law on the experiences of 16th century England. The Berne Convention also gives its limits although for a default of life plus 50 years; although supposedly according to article 7 paragraph (8) the agreement is that each member country of the Union is free to determine its own length for term of protection.

But copyright should be limited not just because it was limited in the past; copyright should be limited because past experiences shows this to be a very good idea. You see, most creative ideas are built upon the foundation of past works, one of the more famous example being Walt Disney's use of the Steamboat Bill cartoon to create Steamboat Willie and thus Mickey Mouse. Modern, more relevant examples are sampling music and academic rebuttal theses on established theories. Imagine what would happen if people like Gallileo and Copernicus was denied their right to their arguments. Actually they were; they were severely punished, even killed, and afterwards their theories proved correct anyways.

People have been so used to the way that copyright is treated in the global marketplace that people have forgotten that copyright is a social contract. We have been so used to treating ideas as legal properties, with characteristics identical to that of physical-material properties (sometimes erroniously as a fundamental human right, even), that we have forgotten that the law governing our ideas is supposed to be an agreement between the citizens of a nation and its respective governments

And then there's the issue of the global market forcing its rules to nations with totally different norms and customs. If any nation in this world would wish to participate in the global marketplace then that nation must conform to the practices set forth by the bigger and more economically powerful nations. This essentially forces less developed nations to abandon a lot of their ideas and cultural identity. There was a story told by my teacher in grade school about how Indonesia's government was forced to crack down on the bootleg casette industry in the '70s and '80s under threat of a US embargo of all textile and textile products from Indonesia (I tried looking for online evidence of this but I couldn't find any). Not all nation-states with different ideas on cultural ownership can be as powerful as the People's Republic of China, which still refuses to be a signatory to the Berne Convention (a decision I personally do not totally disagree with). Every nation has a right to its own opinion, but most other nations must submit to western cultural colonialism.

I feel that Indonesia nowadays is a nation most firmly grounded upon a culture of Kleptocracy. I have been raised as a Kleptocrat, believing that its firmly right to copy audio casettes and software diskettes knowing full well that their creators are not properly compensated. I wish I had been raised on command-line GNU/Linux (or FreeBSD or GNU/HURD, even) instead of on DOS 6.22; if I had beed I would be comfortable enough with Free Software that I would not have to resort to piracy. I know it is wrong but in practice it is a de-facto fact that most of Indonesia's academic institutions and traditions of science would not have been established if not for the eggregarious and efficient distribution of photocopied books. Noone in this nation of minimal GNP could afford the extravagantly high costs of copyrighted software. Thus we copy, lest we be crushed by the wheels of history.

Our nation has consistently ranked among the most corrupt nations of the world for the past few years, one of its primary reason is the public's low regard for the rule of law. The law does not work for people when our most enfringed citizens are barely treated as proper human beings. The law does not work when our abundant wealth is so unfairly distributed. The law does not work when the law can be bought and sold as easily as cheap wine. With all these are truths, the law is nothing more than tools to oppress.

But it does not have to be this way. We as a nation can change if we want. One of the ways to change our respect of law is to change law so as to reflect again the reality of our everyday life. Its not so hard to get people to believe in the law again if the law is formed and enforced justly. One of the places to start is in copyright reform. The rule of law must acknowledge that people do copy and adjust itself as necessary so as not to reenforce the fact that we are a nation of thieves. We are now living in an era where ideas could be spread all over the world at the speed of light, but that speed right now is severely limited by the past's misguided yearning to chain the future. A past which is not that long ago. And that past threatens to change whole nations into thieves (and in some cases depending on how you look at things have long succeeded).

In closing I would like to say that I have too little legal, historical, social background to make an efficient and easy to understand essay on such a complex issue. If you're looking to understand the threat of copyright disfigurement upon culture, I would strongly recommend you to download a copy of the book Free Culture, also available in paperback from Penguin Press. You can also buy it from Amazon.

Note: this disclaimer text was originally part of the sidebar, under the disclaimer section; it has been expanded quite a bit since then. I've decided to turn this into a blog entry because its turning kinda crowded over there on the left/right/side/wherever it is nowadays:)

Though I'm not too sure anything original here is worth copyrighting :)

So here it is...


Pursuant to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Artistic and Literary Works (also available here), ratified by the Government of Indonesia in 1997, all original content in this web site created by fERDI:) (the "Works" or "Original Content") is copyrighted by fERDI:) ("I" or "me"). This includes, but is not limited to, original text and graphics (if any) created by me.

And as I believe in the dissemination of ideas (but still have a bit of capitalistic greed in me, hehe), unless otherwise noted, I hereby license all Works found on this website under the Terms of the Creative Commons Public License, Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike version 2.0 available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/legalcode, or (at the user's choice) later versions (the "License" or the "Creative Commons License"). All uses of Works is governed by the terms set in the Creative Commons License. A layman-readable (simplified) explanation of the Creative Commons License is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/.

There are a few terms set by the Creative Commons License that I would like to point out:

  1. First, You are not required to accept the Creative Commons License, since you have not signed it. However, nothing else grants you permission to copy, distribute, or modify the Original Content, aside from the License and fair use. These actions are prohibited by law if you do not accept the License. Therefore, by copying, distributing or modifying the contents of this site, or by deriving Works herefrom, you indicate your acceptance of the Creative Commons License to do so, and all its terms and conditions for copying, distributing or modifying the Works. Failure to adhere to the terms of the License results in immediate termination of the License. In absence of the license, this work falls under normal copyright (refer to section 7 of the License for details). In other words, if you don't like the license then everything here made by me is copyright by me. Period.

  2. You may only make use of any and all Works in this web site so long as you make clear that my works are created by me. You must also make sure that your use of my Original Contents are non-commercial. And finally you must not place any more limits on others for using my works than the limits that I have imposed upon you for using my works. Section 4 of the License is a thorough and (as far as I can tell) complete explanation of those rights.

  3. Although I have nothing personal against the pursuit of commercial success through the creation of creative works (unless the only singular sole purpose of the creative works is purely for commercial success), I have decided to license using a noncommercial CC license. If you would like to use any of my Works for a commercial purpose you can do so by negotiating another license with me (refer to section 4c of the License for more details). And I would really love to; I sure can use the money :) and I promise I'll be really reasonable :D

  4. All Original Content is meant for personal use only. All opinions expressed are the personal opinions of fERDI:). No claim of thoroughness, accuracy, fairness, or transparency is made upon any information that I discuss in this site, although I do try to make all information as thorough, accurate, fair, and transparet as I possibly can under the circumstances. See Section 5 of the License for details.

  5. And finally, all other content contained in this site not originally created by me or not owned by me is owned by their respective owners/creators, I cannot claim ownership nor authorship upon such works. In other words, I do not and cannot claim I created something that I did not create. This is also (briefly) mentioned in Section 5.

Sounds complicated? Check out the links:) After all, other than my declaration of copyright and licensing, nothing I say matters anyway (check section 8.e. of the License :D)

Posted at 1:39:34 am by ferdikom98
Comments (%d)  

cost of copyright

I had a thought quite a while back: how about an initial 25 year copyright term, with a small registration fee, followed by a second extention for a really big fee for the rest of the author(s') lives or a maximum of 75 years for corporations?

But just yesterday, while searching for a Non-Programmer's Tutorial for Python, I discovered a link by the autor of the guide with a better idea. Its somewhat similar to Lawrence Lessig's copyright registration concept but with a maximum copyright term of 95 years, just like current international copyright practices. But a crucial difference from current practices (a difference shared by Lessig's registration scheme and, not quite incidentaly, my idea above) is that the reregistration cost would prevent all but the most commercially productive copyrights to hold, thus freeing a good majority of copyrighted literature to cultural dialectics.

The paper is entitled Economics of Intellectual Property. Available from Kuro5hin, written by jrincayc, aka. Josh Cogliati.

Posted at 3:01:44 pm by ferdikom98
Comments (%d)  

Next Page

I don't write intellectually. I write expressively. I don't claim to be accurate, fair or thorough. I don't wanna get stuck on certain topics. Though I sometimes do. But not that often. I'd like to expand. I wanna write more poems. But I'll only upload them if they're good. I only rant about my life's hardships if it will rescue just a little bit of my sanity. I'm saner than I make myself out to be, though.

If I am an OS kernel, and I just had a kernel dump, I'd imagine that the text in this blog is what it would more or less look like.

There. Do you get it?


<< December 2004 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31

From my Google Reader

more at my links section
sidesection last edited 08/02/2005

blog creds

If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

rss feed